Skip to main content

Method / Classification checks

Classification disagreement adjudication register

Build an editable classification disagreement adjudication register, with source locators, open decisions and a file your team can review.

One review file using the method in the accompanying guide. The example is fictional.

Start the work product
Conceptual editorial illustration of test the label against the operating property.

One working file to take back to the team

Connect the records. Preserve the exceptions.

1. Inspect two worked rows.

The fictional example shows the actual columns, document mismatches and open decisions for this task.

2. Build your own register.

Start blank, edit the cells and add as many records as the review needs, up to 200 rows per file.

3. Export and assign review.

Download the register as CSV or a readable text file, including source context and edition. The companion below helps organize the next document requests.

Your editable work product

Classification disagreement adjudication register

A practical disagreement-review method for CRE classification, with an editable adjudication sheet and a fictional mixed-use example.

Bring these records

  • Original code and vintage
  • Documented activities
  • Buy-box category
  • Reviewed disposition

How to use the table

  1. Start one row for each record / original code. Keep distinct documents and competing versions separate.
  2. Connect documented activity to the same row. Record a document locator and retain any mismatch instead of silently choosing a value.
  3. Complete reviewer disposition with the decision still open and the person who should review it. Export the register with the source documents.

Start with a blank row or load the fictional example.

Your entries remain in this page only. Download or copy before leaving; nothing is automatically saved or fetched.

Add one record or comparison per row. Leave unknown facts blank or name the missing document. Scroll the table horizontally on a small screen. Each cell accepts up to 2,000 characters.

Classification disagreement adjudication register · 1 row
RowRecord / original codeRecord the record / original code from the documents or leave it unresolved.Documented activityRecord the documented activity from the documents or leave it unresolved.Buy-box ruleRecord the buy-box rule from the documents or leave it unresolved.Proposed classificationRecord the proposed classification from the documents or leave it unresolved.Reviewer dispositionRecord the reviewer disposition from the documents or leave it unresolved.Document / page locatorEnter the actual file, page, exhibit or source record for this row. Method links below are not property evidence.Remove
1Your entry
1 / 200 rows

Take the working file with you

You can export this blank table before filling it in elsewhere. The export includes the kit edition, row provenance and method references. Method references do not verify your property.

CSV copy fallback

If file saving is blocked, copy this into a UTF-8 .csv file.

This table does not upload documents, search records, run an AI model or confirm source facts. The next-request worksheet below is a separate companion; entries are not copied between the two tools.

Companion: document requests

Turn unresolved items into a review handoff.

This separate four-item sheet helps organize supporting requests. It does not copy or analyze the entries in your register.

Open, work, export

Make the next decision easier to review.

A practical disagreement-review method for CRE classification, with an editable adjudication sheet and a fictional mixed-use example.

01 Original code and vintage

Keep the source label reproducible.

Observations and source reference
02 Documented activities

A showroom may alter which buy box fits.

Observations and source reference
03 Buy-box category

Eligibility follows the mandate, not the nearest label.

Observations and source reference
04 Reviewed disposition

An unresolved item needs a specific next request.

Observations and source reference

Works in this page. No uploads, record searches, contact capture or automatic saving. Download your sheet before leaving.

Method and source context

Keep the evidence with the worksheet.

These references explain the method. They do not verify facts about your property. Your export keeps their scope separate from the document references you enter.

North American Industry Classification System

US Census Bureau · Checked 2026-09-30

NAICS classifies business establishments. Its categories do not determine a parcel’s legally permitted use or identify the full operating real estate.

  • Method or documentation reference; no property-level extraction or market study was performed for this guide.
Read source ↗
2018 CBECS building-characteristics tables

US Energy Information Administration · Checked 2026-09-30

Publishes building counts and floorspace separately for a disclosed survey vintage. It is context for explicit units, not current property income or a local market dataset.

  • Method or documentation reference; no property-level extraction or market study was performed for this guide.
Read source ↗
What this edition does
  • This worksheet records your evidence and tasks; it does not retrieve records or independently verify the entered facts.
  • A document marked available still needs review. No investment, permission, ownership or environmental finding is produced.
NextAutomation · Working kit 2026-09-30.1