Skip to main content

Land feasibility evidence

Feasibility dependency and condition register

Build an editable feasibility dependency and condition register, with source locators, open decisions and a file your team can review.

land boundaries, project assumptions and development dependencies

Start the work product
Conceptual illustration of land boundaries, project assumptions and development dependencies

One working file to take back to the team

Connect the records. Preserve the exceptions.

1. Inspect two worked rows.

The fictional example shows the actual columns, document mismatches and open decisions for this task.

2. Build your own register.

Start blank, edit the cells and add as many records as the review needs, up to 200 rows per file.

3. Export and assign review.

Download the register as CSV or a readable text file, including source context and edition. The companion below helps organize the next document requests.

Your editable work product

Feasibility dependency and condition register

Use this worksheet for land boundaries, project assumptions and development dependencies. Record the actual document location beside each observation. The fictional example demonstrates a review problem, not a verified deal.

Bring these records

  • Parcel and access control
  • Approval chronology and conditions
  • Utility service and project dependencies
  • Physical and environmental scope

How to use the table

  1. Start one row for each phase / proposed work. Keep distinct documents and competing versions separate.
  2. Connect control or approval to the same row. Record a document locator and retain any mismatch instead of silently choosing a value.
  3. Complete condition before decision with the decision still open and the person who should review it. Export the register with the source documents.

Start with a blank row or load the fictional example.

Your entries remain in this page only. Download or copy before leaving; nothing is automatically saved or fetched.

Add one record or comparison per row. Leave unknown facts blank or name the missing document. Scroll the table horizontally on a small screen. Each cell accepts up to 2,000 characters.

Feasibility dependency and condition register · 1 row
RowPhase / proposed workRecord the phase / proposed work from the documents or leave it unresolved.Control or approvalRecord the control or approval from the documents or leave it unresolved.Source stageRecord the source stage from the documents or leave it unresolved.External dependencyRecord the external dependency from the documents or leave it unresolved.Condition before decisionRecord the condition before decision from the documents or leave it unresolved.Document / page locatorEnter the actual file, page, exhibit or source record for this row. Method links below are not property evidence.Remove
1Your entry
1 / 200 rows

Take the working file with you

You can export this blank table before filling it in elsewhere. The export includes the kit edition, row provenance and method references. Method references do not verify your property.

CSV copy fallback

If file saving is blocked, copy this into a UTF-8 .csv file.

This table does not upload documents, search records, run an AI model or confirm source facts. The next-request worksheet below is a separate companion; entries are not copied between the two tools.

Companion: document requests

Turn unresolved items into a review handoff.

This separate four-item sheet helps organize supporting requests. It does not copy or analyze the entries in your register.

Open, work, export

Make the next decision easier to review.

Use this worksheet for land boundaries, project assumptions and development dependencies. Record the actual document location beside each observation. The fictional example demonstrates a review problem, not a verified deal.

01 Parcel and access control

Defines which interests support the concept rather than just the map.

Observations and source reference
02 Approval chronology and conditions

Distinguishes application progress from final project authority.

Observations and source reference
03 Utility service and project dependencies

Identifies assumptions that can change the development path.

Observations and source reference
04 Physical and environmental scope

Keeps screening observations separate from verified project geometry.

Observations and source reference

Works in this page. No uploads, record searches, contact capture or automatic saving. Download your sheet before leaving.

Method and source context

Keep the evidence with the worksheet.

These references explain the method. They do not verify facts about your property. Your export keeps their scope separate from the document references you enter.

Commercial Real Estate Lending, Comptroller’s Handbook, version 2.0

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency · Checked 2026-09-30

March 2022 supervisory handbook; lease review, property income, re-leasing costs and property-type distinctions.

  • Bank supervisory guidance, not a property appraisal, current market survey or universal financing standard. No handbook percentage is adopted as a deal assumption.
Read source ↗
Web Soil Survey

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service · Checked 2026-09-30

Soil survey maps, tabular information and interpretations for land-use and management review.

  • Mapped interpretations do not replace field testing, parcel boundaries, water-right records, yield verification or a project geotechnical report.
Read source ↗
Brownfields All Appropriate Inquiries

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · Checked 2026-09-30

Environmental inquiry process, historical uses, records, inspections and significant data gaps.

  • A portal search or this editorial worksheet is not an environmental professional’s assessment or a liability determination.
Read source ↗
What this edition does
  • Editorial workflow, not an automated property investigation, valuation or approval.
  • Public sources support the research questions, not the fictional example facts.
  • A supplied reference remains subject to human review; unknown and conflicting evidence must stay visible.
NextAutomation · Working kit 2026-09-30.1