Skip to main content

New Mexico / Water-layer interpretation

Water-layer-to-instrument interpretation bridge

Build an editable water-layer-to-instrument interpretation bridge, with source locators, open decisions and a file your team can review.

Water-record review

Start the work product
Conceptual illustration of documents and decisions for New Mexico commercial property research

One working file to take back to the team

Connect the records. Preserve the exceptions.

1. Inspect two worked rows.

The fictional example shows the actual columns, document mismatches and open decisions for this task.

2. Build your own register.

Start blank, edit the cells and add as many records as the review needs, up to 200 rows per file.

3. Export and assign review.

Download the register as CSV or a readable text file, including source context and edition. The companion below helps organize the next document requests.

Your editable work product

Water-layer-to-instrument interpretation bridge

Record what the selected layer actually says, then separate the right-file review from the proposed service arrangement. No water features are fetched by this worksheet.

Bring these records

  • Layer identity and coded status
  • Proposed supply arrangement
  • Underlying file review
  • Project-specific service response

How to use the table

  1. Start one row for each layer / original code. Keep distinct documents and competing versions separate.
  2. Connect decoded status to the same row. Record a document locator and retain any mismatch instead of silently choosing a value.
  3. Complete unresolved project inference with the decision still open and the person who should review it. Export the register with the source documents.

Start with a blank row or load the fictional example.

Your entries remain in this page only. Download or copy before leaving; nothing is automatically saved or fetched.

Add one record or comparison per row. Leave unknown facts blank or name the missing document. Scroll the table horizontally on a small screen. Each cell accepts up to 2,000 characters.

Water-layer-to-instrument interpretation bridge · 1 row
RowLayer / original codeRecord the layer / original code from the documents or leave it unresolved.Decoded statusRecord the decoded status from the documents or leave it unresolved.Right-file referenceRecord the right-file reference from the documents or leave it unresolved.Proposed supply routeRecord the proposed supply route from the documents or leave it unresolved.Unresolved project inferenceRecord the unresolved project inference from the documents or leave it unresolved.Document / page locatorEnter the actual file, page, exhibit or source record for this row. Method links below are not property evidence.Remove
1Your entry
1 / 200 rows

Take the working file with you

You can export this blank table before filling it in elsewhere. The export includes the kit edition, row provenance and method references. Method references do not verify your property.

CSV copy fallback

If file saving is blocked, copy this into a UTF-8 .csv file.

This table does not upload documents, search records, run an AI model or confirm source facts. The next-request worksheet below is a separate companion; entries are not copied between the two tools.

Companion: document requests

Turn unresolved items into a review handoff.

This separate four-item sheet helps organize supporting requests. It does not copy or analyze the entries in your register.

Open, work, export

Make the next decision easier to review.

Record what the selected layer actually says, then separate the right-file review from the proposed service arrangement. No water features are fetched by this worksheet.

01 Layer identity and coded status

Prevents a map feature from becoming an affirmative service claim.

Observations and source reference
02 Proposed supply arrangement

Defines the project question the source must answer.

Observations and source reference
03 Underlying file review

Separates map attributes from a qualified interpretation.

Observations and source reference
04 Project-specific service response

Tests the assumption used in the development case.

Observations and source reference

Works in this page. No uploads, record searches, contact capture or automatic saving. Download your sheet before leaving.

Method and source context

Keep the evidence with the worksheet.

These references explain the method. They do not verify facts about your property. Your export keeps their scope separate from the document references you enter.

Municipal Water Rights layer schema

New Mexico Office of the State Engineer · Checked 2026-09-30

Public ArcGIS schema for the Municipal Water Rights layer, including identity and coded status fields.

  • Schema inspection only, with no feature extraction. It cannot establish statewide completeness, parcel service or an individual water right’s legal status.
Read source ↗
What this edition does
  • The example is fictional and remains labelled after editing.
  • The worksheet organizes your inputs; it does not retrieve records, verify a property or issue a professional determination.
NextAutomation · Working kit 2026-09-30.1